Brad Pistotnik

A lawyer in Wichita, Kansas, will have to pay about $430,000 after pleading guilty in connection with a cyberattack on websites that posted negative information about him.

Lawyer Brad Pistotnik pleaded guilty Tuesday to three misdemeanour counts of being an accessory after the fact to an extortionate threat over the internet. He was ordered to pay a $375,000 fine and restitution of $55,200. The lump sum payment due immediately totaled $430,500, according to the judgment listing the fines ordered, which was filed Wednesday.

Pistotnik, 63, is known as “the Bull” because of commercials for his services as an accident lawyer in which he rides a bull.

The plea agreement, filed Tuesday, says Pistotnik met with a co-defendant offering web design and reputation management services in September 2014. The co-defendant, software engineer David Dorsett, then flooded servers for three websites with emails demanding the takedown of negative information about Pistotnik, the plea agreement alleges.

The websites attacked were and the website for the law firm Jaburg Wilk. RipoffReport posted a negative review of Pistotnik. Jaburg Wilk represented RipoffReport.

After the negative review was removed from RipoffReport, Dorsett sent Pistotnik an email describing his method and showing that the negative information on RipoffReport had been removed, according to the plea agreement. Four days later, Dorsett sent Pistotnik an invoice for his services, which Pistotnik paid the same day.

Pistotnik’s lawyer, Mark Schoenhofer, said that his client had gotten involved with the wrong person and he had learned from the incident. “This was an unfortunate thing,” Schoenhofer said.

A change of plea hearing for Dorsett is pending as per news stories.

blog articles

All you need to know about new revenge porn laws in South Africa

New bills signed into law recently mean it's now illegal to distribute sexually graphic images of individuals without their consent. Amendments to the Films and Publications Act mean a person found guilty of so-called "revenge porn" could now face up to four years in prison or a fine of up to R300,000. Lawyer Verlie Oosthuizen [...]

CDA Section 230 does NOT help Big Tech Companies

Who benefits from Section 230, the federal law that shields online platforms from liability for content posted by users? According to commentators and politicians, Section 230 helps only large tech companies. But the biggest beneficiaries of Section 230 are internet users, not internet companies. Before Congress undermines Section 230, it must understand how users rely on it — and [...]

Homebuilder sues customer for over $500k for negative online review

The lawsuit filed by Adair Homes Inc. raises interesting questions about what consumers can say online and the ability of businesses to protect their reputation. The world of online reviews can be a contentious space with complaints and grievances filling up web pages and discussion boards. Now, an Oregon man’s dispute about a custom-built home [...]

Comments are closed.


Show all websites